Nanoparticles and Its Properties

Introduction:

The prefix 'nano' means a billionth ($10^{-9}$). The field of nanotechnology is the study of various structures of matter having dimensions of the order of a billionth of a meter. These particles are called nanoparticles. Nanotechnology is based on the fact that particles that are smaller than about $100 nm$ give rise to new properties of nanostructures built from them.

Particles that are smaller than the characteristic length for a particular phenomenon show different physical and chemical properties than particles of larger sizes. For example, mechanical properties, optical properties, conductivity, melting point, and reactivity have all been observed to change when particles become smaller than the characteristic length.

Gold and silver nanoparticles were used in window glass panes to obtain a variety of beautiful colors. Nanotechnology has a wide range of applications like producing lighter but stronger materials, constructing faster switches for computers, improving drug delivery to specific organs of the body, etc.

The radii of atoms and most of the molecules are less than a nanometer. Nanoparticles are generally considered to have a radius in the range of $1 nm$ to $100 nm$ which can have $25$ to $10^{6}$ atoms. A cluster of $1 nm$ radius has approximately $25$ atoms. This definition of nanoparticles based on size does not distinguish between molecules and nanoparticles as many organic molecules contain more than $25$ atoms.

Nanoparticles can be more appropriately defined as an aggregate of atoms, with a radius between 1 nm and 100 nm, with dimensions less than the characteristic length of some physical phenomena.

When particle size is less than the characteristic length of some physical phenomena, the particles show different properties. The nanoparticles show unique properties that change with their size. Classical mechanics is able to explain the properties of bulk materials but is unable to explain the properties of nanoparticles. Quantum mechanical principles have to be used to explain the properties of the nanoparticles.

Properties of Nanoparticles

As discussed earlier, the properties of nanoparticles are different from the bulk material. The properties of nanoparticles also vary with size and shape. Hence different properties can be obtained by changing the size and shape of the nanoparticles. Some of the properties of nanoparticles are as follows :

1) Optical properties: The color of nanoparticles is different from the bulk material. When a bulk material is reduced in size to a few hundred atoms, the energy band structure of the bulk material changes to a set of discrete energy levels. Atomic clusters of different sizes will have different energy level separations. As clusters of different sizes have different energy level separations, the color of the clusters (which are due to transitions between the energy levels) will depend on their size. Hence the size of the cluster can be altered to change the colour of a material. For example, gold in bulk form appears yellow but gold nanoparticles appear bright red in color. The medieval glass makers produced tinted glass with a beautiful variety of colors by dissolving metal particles like gold, silver, cobalt, iron, etc. Due to these metal nanoparticles, the glasses appear colored.

In semiconductor nanoparticles (which are used in quantum dots) there is a significant shift in the optical absorption spectra towards blue as the particle size is reduced.

2) Electrical properties: The resistivity in bulk matter is mainly due to the scattering of electrons by ions and crystal defects. In nanostructures, the resistivity mainly depends on scattering from the boundaries of nanoparticles when particle size becomes less than the mean free path between collisions. Thus smaller particle size increases the resistivity.

Various types of defects in the lattice also increase the resistivity by limiting the mean free path. However many nanostructures are too small to have internal defects.

Another effect of reduced size is the confinement of conduction electrons. In bulk conductors, the electrons move freely throughout the entire conductor. The situation changes when one or more dimensions of the conductor are made very small.

Consider a flat conducting plate with a large length and width but a small thickness in the range of a few nanometers. In this configuration, called a quantum well, the electron will be confined along one dimension but will move freely along the remaining two dimensions.

If a conducting wire has a long length but a very small diameter, the electrons can move freely along the length but will be confined in two mutually perpendicular transverse directions. This configuration is known as a quantum wire.

If all three dimensions of the conductor are in nanometer range, the configuration is called a quantum dot and the electron is confined in all three dimensions. Confinement of electrons to small dimensions leads to quantization of energy.
Coulomb Staircase
The level of doping in semiconductors gives rise to another important phenomenon. For typical doping levels of 1 donor impurity atom in $10^{8}$ atoms of semiconductor atoms, a quantum dot of $10^{7}$ semiconductor atoms would have an average of $10^{-1}$ electrons. In other words, on an average, one quantum dot in 10 will have a free electron. These result in the phenomena of single-electron tunneling and coulomb blockade. The conduction is due to the tunneling of electrons through the quantum dot. The electrons are blocked from tunneling except at discrete voltage change positions. This phenomenon is called coulomb blockade. The I-V characteristic shown in the above Figure is called the coulomb staircase.

3) Magnetic properties: Magnetic properties are basically due to the orbital and spin motions of electrons around the nucleus. Every electron in an atom has spin and orbital magnetic moment which, when added, gives the total magnetic moment of the electron. The vector sum of all the moments of electrons gives the total moment of the atom. In most of the atoms, the net magnetic moment is zero.

However, atoms like iron, cobalt, and manganese, have a net magnetic moment. Crystals of these become atoms ferromagnetic when magnetic moments of all atoms are aligned in the same direction. The magnetic moment of magnetic nanoparticles is observed to be less than the value for perfect alignment of all moments. The net magnetic moment is observed to decrease with increasing temperature. This is due to thermal vibration of atoms in the cluster which disturbs the alignment of magnetic moments.
B-H Curve Ferromagnetic Material
In bulk ferromagnetic materials, the magnetic moment is less than the moment the material would have if every atomic moment were aligned in the same direction. This is due to the presence of 'domains' which are regions in which all atomic moments are in one direction but moments of different domains are in different directions. When bulk ferromagnetic materials are subjected to alternating magnetic fields, they show hysteresis for which the B-H curve is shown in the above Figure (a). In nanosized ferromagnetic particles, essentially consisting of a single domain, there is no hysteresis and the $B-H$ curve is as shown in the above Figure (b). These particles are called the superparamagnetic.

The saturation magnetization is observed to increase significantly on decreasing the particle size. Another interesting property of nanoparticles is that clusters made of up nonmagnetic atoms like rhenium show magnetic moment which increases with the decrease in particle size.

4) Structural properties: The structure of small nanoparticles can be entirely different from that of the bulk material. The crystal structure of large nanoparticles is observed to be the same as the bulk material but with different lattice parameters. As a result of the changed structure, the electronic structure changes which in turn leads to changes in optical properties and reactivity. (TWD)

5) Mechanical properties: Mechanical properties like hardness, elasticity, and ductility depend upon the bonds between atoms. Imperfections in the crystal structure and impurities result in changes in these properties. As the nanoparticles are highly pure and free from imperfections, they show different mechanical properties than the bulk material. It has been observed that Young's modulus decreases in metallic nanocrystals with a decrease in particle size. The yield stress has been observed to increase with the decrease in grain size in bulk materials with nanosized grains. Hence stronger materials can be produced by making materials with nanosized grains. The carbon nanotubes are estimated to be about 20 times stronger than steel.

Difference Between Prism Spectra and Grating Spectra

Prism Spectra

1.) Prism spectra are obtained by the phenomena of dispersion of light.

2.) Prism spectra have only one order.

3.) A prism spectrum is of bright intensity.

4.) In prism spectra, spectral colors overlap each other.

5.) Red color is dispersed least whereas violet color disperses the maximum.

6.) Prism spectrum depends upon the material of prism.

7.) The prism spectral lines are curved.

. Grating Spectra

1.) Grating spectra are obtained by the phenomena of diffraction of light.

2.) Grating spectra has more than one order.

3.) Grating spectra is of less intensity.

4.) In grating spectra, there is no overlapping of color.

5.) Red color diffracts the maximum whereas violet color diffracts the least.

6.) Grating spectra are independent of the material of grating.

7.) The grating spectral lines are almost straight.

Difference between interference and diffraction

Interference

1.) It is due to the superposition of two or more than two wavefronts coming from coherent sources.

2.) The intensity of all bright fringes are same

3.) Interference fringes either of the same size or decrease after moving away from the center.

4.) Dark fringes are usually perfectly dark.

5.) A minimum coherent source is needed.

Diffraction:

1.) It occurs due to secondary wavelets, originating from infinite different points of the same wavefronts.

2.) Central maxima of bright fringe is followed by either side maxima of decreasing intensity.

3.) Interference fringes are never of the same shape and size.

4.) Dark fringes are not perfectly dark.

5.) It is possible by either one or more than one source which need not be coherent.

Superconductors and its properties

Superconductivity

The property of a substance in which the electrical resistance of the substance is zero at very low temperatures. This property of substance is called superconductivity.

For certain substances, like mercury, the resistivity suddenly drops to zero at very low temperatures typically near the boiling point of liquid helium. Some metals, doped semiconductors, alloys and ceramics (i.e. these are insulators at room temperature and superconduct at higher temperatures than the metals) show superconductivity.

Temperature Dependence of Resistivity

In superconducting substances, the resistivity suddenly drops to zero at a particular temperature known as critical temperature ($T_{c}$) or transition temperature and remains zero below that as shown in Figure below.
Temperature Dependence  of Resistivity in Superconductor
The critical temperature for mercury is $4.2 K$. Below this critical temperature, mercury is superconducting whereas above this temperature it behaves like a normal conductor. Different superconducting materials have different critical temperatures but the nature of the variation in resistivity with temperature remains more or less similar.

Properties of Superconductors

1.) Zero electrical resistance:

The electrical resistivity of superconductors is zero at very low temperatures. The experimental testing of zero resistance was tried by connecting the substance at room temperature to a battery. A voltmeter was connected across the specimen to measure the electric potential difference across the specimen as shown in Figure below.
Zero Electrical Resistance of Superconductor Experiment
As the temperature of the substance gets lowered. It was observed that below a particular temperature (i.e. critical temperature), the electric potential difference across the substance suddenly dropped to zero.

2) Meissner effect:

When a substance is placed in a weak magnetic field and cooled below the critical temperature then this substance behaves like perfect diamagnets with zero magnetic induction. This phenomenon is called the Meissner effect.
Meissner Effect
The magnetic induction inside the substance in the normal state is given by, Superconductors

$B = \mu_{\circ} (H +M)$

where $H$ is the externally applied magnetic field and $M$ is the magnetization inside the substance.

When the temperature $T$ of the specimen is lowered below its critical temperature

$B= 0$

$M_{\circ}(H + M) = 0$

$H = - M$

The susceptibility $\chi$ is given by,

$\chi=\frac{M}{H}$

For diamagnetic substance $\chi=-1$

As the relative permeability

$\mu_{r}=1+\chi$

$\therefore \mu_{r}=0$

This indicates perfect diamagnetism.

Meissner effect cannot be explained by assuming that the superconductor is a perfect conductor with zero electrical conductivity. The electric field is given by,

$E=\frac{V}{l}$

$E=\frac{iR}{l}$

$E=\frac{iR}{l} \frac{A}{A}$

$E=\frac{RA}{l} \frac{i}{A}$

$E=\rho J$

Where

$\rho$ = Resistivity
$J$= Current density

If $\rho$ becomes zero for a finite current density $J$, then $E =0$.

From Maxwell's equations,

$\nabla \times \overrightarrow{E} = \frac{d \overrightarrow{B}}{dt}$

As $E=0$, $\frac{d \overrightarrow{B}}{dt} =0$

$\therefore \overrightarrow{B} = Constant$

$\therefore$ In a conductor the flux cannot change on cooling below the critical temperature. This contradicts the Meissner effects according to which the flux must reduce to zero and hence superconductor is not just a perfect conductor.

Due to the Meissner effect, superconductors strongly repel external magnets which leads to magnetic levitation.

3) Effect of magnetic field on superconductors :

Superconductivity is destroyed by sufficiently strong magnetic fields. The minimum value of the applied magnetic field required to destroy superconductivity is called the critical field $H_{c}$. and is a function of temperature. Above the critical temperature $T_{c}$, $H_{c} = 0$. Below the critical temperature, the variation of $H_{c}$, with temperature $T$ is as shown in Figure below and be represented by the equation
Effect of Magnetic Field on superconductor
$H_{c}=H_{\circ} \left[ 1- \left(\frac{T}{T_{c}}\right) \right]$

where $H_{\circ}$ is the critical field at absolute zero.

4) Persistent currents :

When a ring is placed in the magnetic field and the field is switched off, a current is induced in the ring. This induced current is called the persistent current.
Persistent Current
The magnitude of current remains constant even though there is no source of e.m.f. as the resistance of the superconducting ring is zero. These currents flowing in the ring produce magnetic fields that do not require any power supply to maintain a constant field.

5) Isotope effect :

According to observations, the critical temperature of superconductors varies with isotopic mass. The critical temperature is smaller for larger isotopic mass. This phenomenon is called the isotope effect.

The relation between critical temperature $T_{c}$ and isotopic mass $M$ is given by,

$T_{c}M^{a} = Constant$

For most of the materials $a =\frac{1}{2}$

$\therefore T_{c}M^{\frac{1}{2}} = Constant$

$\therefore T_{c} \propto M^{-\frac{1}{2}} $

As lattice vibrations are reduced for larger isotopic masses, the isotope effect indicates that superconductivity is due to the interaction between electrons and lattice vibrations.

6) Critical Current:

All the current-carrying conductor produces a magnetic field around it. Similarly, When current flows through a superconducting wire, a magnetic field is produced around it. If the current in the superconducting wire is increased, the magnetic field intensity just outside it will increase and reach the critical field $H_{c}$. If the current is increased beyond this value, the wire will be subjected to a magnetic field exceeding the critical field due to which the superconducting state will be destroyed and then it will revert to its normal state. The maximum current that a superconductor can carry without reverting back to its normal state is known as critical current.

The magnetic induction due to a wire of radius $r$ just outside it is

$B=\frac{\mu_{\circ}i}{2 \pi r}$

$\mu_{\circ} H=\frac{\mu_{\circ}i}{2 \pi r}$

$H=\frac{i}{2 \pi r}$

If the critical current in $_{c}$, and critical field is $H_{c}$, ,

$H_{c}=\frac{i_{c}}{2 \pi r}$

$i_{c}=2 \pi r H_{c}$

Types of Superconductors

There are two types of superconductors based on the difference in magnetization exhibited by them. These are known as Type-I (or soft) and Type-II (or hard) superconductors.

1) Type-I Superconductors (Soft superconductors):

The magnetization curve for a Type-I -M superconductor is shown in Figure below. Type-I superconductors show the complete Meissner effect when the applied magnetic field H is less than the critical field $H_{c}$.
Type - I Superconductor
The magnetization in the superconductor is proportional to the applied field and the superconductors behave like perfect diamagnet.

For $H > H_{ç}$, the magnetization is negligible and the superconductor becomes a normal conductor. Pure elements show such magnetization curves. The values of $H_{c}$, are very low.

2) Type-II Superconductors (Hard superconductors)

The magnetization curve for a type-II superconductor is shown in Figure below.
Type - II Superconductor
There are two critical field $H_{c1}$ and $H_{c2}$ in Type-II superconductors that characterize it. Upto the lower critical field $H_{c1}$, the superconductor is perfectly diamagnetic and flux is completely ejected out from the superconductor. The magnetization in the superconductor is proportional to the applied field. Between $H_{c1}$ and $H_{c2}$, the Meissner effect is incomplete but electrically it is a superconductor but not magnetically. This state is called the mixed state or the vortex state.

The values of $H_{c}$ may be $100$ times or higher than the critical field $H_{c}$, for type-I superconductors.

Above the higher critical field $H_{c2}$ the superconductor becomes a normal conductor.

Type-II superconductors are usually alloys or transition metals with high values of electrical resistivity in the normal state.

High-Temperature Superconductors

Kamerlingh Onnes discovered superconductivity in mercury in 1911 with a critical temperature of $4.2 K$. The research was then focussed on materials with larger critical temperatures so that the phenomenon could become commercially viable.

But, till about 1986, the highest critical temperatures were observed to be nearly $20 K$. In 1986, an oxide of lanthanum, barium, and copper ($La_{1.85} Ba_{0.15} CuO_{4}$) was observed to have a critical temperature of $36 K$. In 1987, an oxide of yttrium, barium and copper ($YBa_{2}Cu_{3},0_{7}$) was found to have a critical temperature of $90 K$ and then an oxide of thallium, barium, calcium and copper($Tl_{2}Ba_{2}Ca_{2}Cu_{3}O_{10}$) was found to have a critical temperature of $120 K$.

The presence of parallel sheets of $CuO_{2}$ is the main feature of high-temperature superconductors.. Efforts are going on to find superconductors with critical temperatures near room temperature.

Kinetic Theory of Ideal Gases

German scientists R.Classius and J.C. Maxwell had propounded the kinetic theory of gases. According to this model, every gas is made up of very fine particles called molecules. All the molecules of a gas are similar in all properties. We know that $ 1 cm^{3}$ of water at $100^{\circ}C$ temperature and $1$ atmosphere pressure produces $1671 cm$ of water vapour. From this, it is known that the volume actually occupied by the molecules in $1671 cm^{3}$ of water vapour is only $1 cm^{3}$ and the remaining $1670 cm^{3}$ of volume is empty. In other words, we can say that in the gaseous state of matter, there is a lot of free space between the molecules. This fact is true for all gases. The molecules of gases are always moving randomly in all possible directions. During motion, these molecules collide with each other and with the walls of the vessel in which the gas is kept. After each collision, both the direction and speed of motion of these molecules keep changing.

All collisions between molecules and molecules or between molecules and the walls are elastic. This implies that total kinetic energy and momentum are conserved.

Assumptions of Kinetic Theory of Gases

There are the following assumptions of the kinetic theory of gases.

1. The molecules of a gas are very small, rigid, spherical and completely elastic. The volume of the molecules is the volume in which the gas is present, is negligible compared to the volume of the gas.

2. Although the molecules of a gas can move with every possible velocity in every direction, but the number of molecules per unit volume or molecular density remains the same.

3. There is no force of attraction or repulsion between the molecules, as a result of which they do not have potential energy, their entire energy is kinetic energy.

4. When the molecules of a gas come very close to each other, there is a repulsive force between them, due to which their speed and direction of motion change. This phenomenon is called a 'collision' between two molecules. Between two consecutive collisions, the molecules move in a straight line with a constant speed. The distance travelled by the molecule between two consecutive collisions is called the free path and its average is called the mean free path.

5. The mutual collision between the molecules and the collision between the molecule and the wall is perfectly elastic, that is, the kinetic energy of the molecules is conserved.

6 The time of collision between the molecules is negligible compared to the distance travelled freely by the molecule.

7. Since the amount of molecules is negligible and the velocity is high, therefore there is no effect of gravity on the motion of the molecules.

Newton's Corpuscular Model

Newton's Corpuscular Theory

In the year 1675, Newton proposed the corpuscular theory of light to explain the existing phenomenon of light. There are the following assumptions of this theory:

1. The light consists of very small, lightweight, and invisible particles. These particles are known as corpuscles.

2. These corpuscles move with the velocity of light in a homogeneous medium in all possible directions in a straight line and they carry kinetic energy with them.

3. When these corpuscles fall on the retina of the eye, they produce the sensation of vision.

4. The size of corpuscles of different colors is different (ie, the color of light depends on the size of the corpuscle).

(A) Success of Carpuscles Theory

Based on this theory, the following facts related to light were explained successfully:

1. The light has energy: Since corpuscles have kinetic energy. Therefore, the energy of the light beam is due to the kinetic energy of the corpuscles.

2. Motion of light along a straight line: Since velocity of the corpuscle is very high, the effect of external forces on it is negligible. Therefore, it moves in a straight line.

3. Motion of light in vacuum: Corpuscles can move through vacuum.

4. Reflection of light: To explain the reflection of light, Newton assumed that when a corpuscle reaches close to a reflecting surface, then the surface repels it with a force whose direction is perpendicular to the surface and whose magnitude decreases sharply as the distance of corpuscles increases from the surface.
Reflection by Newton’s Corpuscular Theory
In Figure, let $PO$ be a reflecting surface and $P'Q'$ be an imaginary surface just above it at negligible height. When a light corpuscle moves towards the surface, then it moves along a straight line from $A$ to $B$ (since the force is zero). As it reaches the point $B$ of surface $PQ$, a repulsive force starts acting perpendicular to the surface (upward in the figure). Let $i$ is an angle of incidence at point $B$, then the velocity of the corpuscles at point $B$ has two components- component parallel to surface $V_{||} =v \: sin \: i$ and component perpendicular to surface $V_{|} = v \: cos \: i$. After crossing point $B$, the parallel component remains same but the perpendicular component decreases. At point $C$ of surface $PQ$, the perpendicular component becomes zero. After this direction of the perpendicular component changes and the corpuscles move along path CD. Beyond D again it moves along a straight line as the force becomes ineffective. If $r$ is the angle of reflection at point $D$, then the parallel component of velocity at $D$ will be $v\: sin\: r$. Since the parallel component remains constant. Therefore, comparing them at points $B$ and $D$.

$v \: sin \: i=v \: sin\: r$

$sin \: i= sin\: r$

$i=r$

i.e., the above equation shows that the incident angle and the reflected angle are equal. In the figure above, incident ray, reflected ray and normal all three are in the plane of paper. Therefore laws of reflection are verified.

5. Refraction of light: To explain the refraction of light, Newton considered two different situations :

a.) When the light goes from a denser medium to a rare medium: In this condition when the corpuscle reaches near the surface, the surface exerts a normal repulsive force on it. As a result, the perpendicular component of velocity of the corpuscles decreases however it does not reduce to zero as in the case of refraction. Therefore, enters the second medium with a reduced perpendicular component and same constant value of the parallel component i.e., moves along a straight line bending away from normal.

Refraction by Newton’s Corpuscular Theory-1
If $i$ and $r$ are the angle of incidence and angle of refraction and $v_{1}$ and $v_{2}$ are the velocity of corpuscle in medium first and second medium. If the parallel component is constant,

$v_{1} \: sin \: i =v_{2} \: sin\: r$

$\frac{sin \: i}{sinr} =\frac{v_{2}}{v_{1}}$

From Figure

$i \lt r$

Therefore

$sin \: i \lt sin\: r$

$v_{2} \lt v_{1}$

Therefore, from the corpuscular theory, velocity light in a denser medium ($v_{1}$) is greater than the velocity light in a rare medium ($v_{2}$).

b.) When the light goes from a rare medium to a denser medium: In this condition when the corpuscle reaches near to the surface, the surface attracts it normally. As a result, the normal component of its velocity increases. Therefore, the corpuscular enters the second medium with an increased normal component and the same parallel component of velocity and moves along a straight line bending towards the normal. 
Refraction by Newton’s Corpuscular Theory-2
$v_{1} \: sin \: i =v_{2} \: sin\: r$

$\frac{sin \: i}{sinr} =\frac{v_{2}}{v_{1}}$

From Figure

$i \gt r$

Therefore

$ sin \: i \gt sin\: r$

$v_{2} \gt v_{1}$

Therefore, velocity light in a denser medium ($v_{1}$) is greater than the velocity light in a rare medium ($v_{2}$).

B) Failure of the Corpuscles Theory

The following are the main reasons for the failure of this theory:

1. Interference, diffraction, polarisation of light, and the photoelectric effect, etc. can not be explained using this principle. For example, in interference, when two light beams interfere, darkness is produced at the same places. It is not possible that two corpuscles destroy each other.

2. According to this theory, the velocity of light is greater in the denser medium as compared to the rare medium. But Focault's had proved experimentally that the velocity of light is less in denser mediums as compared to the velocity of light in rare mediums.

3. According to this theory, greater the temperature of the source greater the velocity of the corpuscles. Actually, the velocity of light does not depend on the temperature of the source.

4. According to this theory, the mass of the source should decrease as it continuously emits corpuscles but it does not happen in reality.

5. In this theory two opposite assumptions are considered to explain reflection and refraction. To explain reflection and refraction through denser to rarer, the repulsive force by the surface is assumed and to explain refraction from rare to denser, the force of attraction by the surface is assumed. These assumptions are opposite and they don't have any scientific base.

Nuclear force and its properties

Nuclear Force
A forces that act between the nucleons (i.e proton and neutron) inside the nucleus. This force is called the nuclear force.
These forces are responsible to keep the nucleons bound inside the nucleus.

Properties of Nuclear Force

There are the following properties of nuclear force is given below.

(i) These are strong nuclear forces otherwise protons cannot exist in the nucleus.

(ii) The intensity of these forces is very large. The intensity of nuclear force is maximum among, so far known forces.

(iii) It is not electrical in nature. If we assume them electrical forces, then the protons cannot reside in nucleus.

(iv) These forces do not depend on charge. The force acting between the nucleons (such as proton-proton, neutron-neutron and proton-neutron) is of same nature.

(v) These are not gravitational forces because the mass of the particles inside the nucleus is very small, while the magnitude of nuclear force is very large.

(vi) These forces are short range forces. They are confined inside the nucleus (i. e., $10^{-15} m$ equal to the diameter of nucleus). There is no existence of these forces outside the nucleus.

Limitations of Bohr's Model

Although Bohr's model of hydrogen atom and hyarogen like atom was successful in explaining the stability and spectrum even then it has few limitations. which are as follows:

(1) This model could not explain the spectrum of atom having more than one electron.

(2) This model could not explain the relative intensity of spectral lines. (i. e., few transitions are more acceptable than others why?)

(3) When a spectral line is observed by spectroscope of high resolution power, more than one lines are observed. This is known as fine structure of spectral line. Bohr model could not explain this.

(4) Splitting of spectral lines in external magnetic field (Zeeman's effect) and in external electric field (Stark's effect) could not be explained by this model.

(5) This model could not explain the distribution of electrons in different orbit.

Few limitations of Bohr's model are removed in Somer-field's model of atom. (In this model, the orbit of electron was considered as elliptical instead of circular ). But this model also has its limitations. Vector atomic model, which is based on quantum mechanics, explains clearly the structure of atom.

Comparison of Isothermal and Adiabatic Processes for an Ideal Gas

Isothermal Process:

1.) In this process temperature remains constant i.e.$(\Delta T= 0)$.

2.) In this process internal energy remains constant i.e. $(\Delta U= 0)$.

3.) This process takes place very slowly.

4.) In this process the system is surrounded by a perfectly conducting material, whose conductivity is infinite.

5.) This process obeys Boyle's law i.e. $(PV= constant)$.

6.) In this process the slope of isothermal curve $=-\frac{P}{V}$

7.) In this process specific heat of gas should be infinite.

Adiabatic Process:

1.) In this process exchange of heat does not take place i.e. $(\Delta Q= 0)$ but temperature changes.

2.) In this process internal energy changes.

3.) This process takes place very rapidly.

4.) In this process the system is surrounded by a perfectly insulating material, whose conductivity is zero.

5.) This process obeys Poisson's law i.e. $(PV^{\gamma} = constant)$.

6.) In this process the slope of adiabatic curve $=- \gamma \frac{P}{V}$

7.) In this process specific heat of gas should be zero.

Concept of Perfect Gas

Concept of Perfect (ideal) Gas:
An imaginary gas whose properties are similar to the properties of a real gas (a gas whose molecules occupy space and interact with each other) at infinitely low pressure. This imaginary gas is called 'perfect gas' or ideal gas'.
According to the definition, the following properties are imagined in a perfect gas :

(1) It strictly obeys Boyle's law, Charles' law, and the law of pressure under all conditions of temperature and pressure.

(2) Its pressure coefficient and volume coefficient are exactly equal to each other.

(2) Its molecules are infinitesimally small.

(3) There is no force of attraction between its molecules. Obviously, a perfect gas cannot be converted into a liquid or solid state, because a force of attraction is necessary between the molecules in the liquid or the solid state.

In practice, the gases that are difficult to liquefy, such as oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, and helium can be considered as perfect, although these are also not ideally perfect.

Failure of Wave Theory in Explaining Photoelectric Emission Effect

Description of failure of wave theory in explaining photoelectric effect:

Although reflection, refraction, interference, diffraction and polarisation etc. are explained on the basis of wave theory but the laws of photoelectric effect cannot be explained on the basis of the wave theory of light. There are three main reasons for failure:

1.) According to wave theory, as the intensity of incident light increases, incident energy also increases. Therefore, greater is the intensity, greater will be the energy absorbed by the electrons of metal and therefore greater should be the kinetic energy of photoelectrons. From experimental observations, it is clear that the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons does not depend on the intensity of incident light.

2.) According to wave theory, photoelectric emission should occur for all the frequencies provided that it has enough energy to emit the electrons from the metal. Although from experimental observation it is clear that if the frequency of incident light is less than the threshold frequency, photoelectrons are not emitted.

3.) The energy carried by the light waves is absorbed by all the electrons and not by a single electron. Therefore, if the intensity of light is less, for the emission of electrons, there should be some time to collect sufficient energy. Although it is clear from experimental observation, the electrons are emitted instantaneously, whatever small be the intensity of light.

Popular Posts