Skip to main content

Fraunhofer diffraction due to a double slit

Let a plane wavefront be incident normally on slit $S_{1}$ and $S_{2}$ of equal $e$ and separated by an opaque distance $d$.The diffracted light is focused on the screen $XY$. The diffracted pattern on the screen consists of equally spaced bright and dark fringe due to interference of light from both the slits and modulated by diffraction pattern from individual slits. op

The diffraction pattern due to double-slit can be explained considering the following points →
  • All the points in slits $S_{1}$ and $S_{2}$ will send secondary waves in all directions.

  • All the secondary waves moving along the incident wave will be focussed at $P$ and the diffracted waves will be focussed at $P'$

  • The amplitude at $P'$ is the resultant from two slit each of amplitude $R=\frac{A\:sin\alpha}{\alpha}$

  • T two waves from two-slit $S_{1}$ and $S_{2}$ will interfere at $P'$

  • Fraunhofer diffraction due to double slits
    Fraunhofer diffraction due to double slits

    Expression for Intensity →

    $\Delta = S_{2}M$

    $\Delta=(e+d)sin\theta\qquad(1)$

    The corresponding phase difference →

    $\Delta\phi= \frac{2\pi}{\lambda}(e+d)sin\theta \qquad(2)$

    Let $\Delta \phi =2 \beta \qquad(3)$

    $\beta=\frac{\pi}{\lambda}(e+d)sin\theta\qquad(4)$

    The resultant amplitude at $P'$ can be obtained by the vector addition method. The resultant amplitude at $P'$
    Resultant Vector
    Resultant Vector
    $R'^{2}=R^{2}+R^{2}+2R.R.cos\Delta\phi$

    $R'^{2}=R^{2}+R^{2}+2R.R.cos2\beta$ {\qquad $\because 2\beta=\Delta\phi$}

    $R'^{2}=2R^{2}+2R^{2}cos2\beta$

    $R'^{2}=2R^{2} \left( 1+cos2\beta \right)$

    $R'^{2}=4R^{2} cos^{2}\beta \qquad(5)$

    Where $R$ - Resultant amplitude of each slit $S_{1}$

    $R=\frac{A\: sin\alpha}{\alpha} \qquad(6)$

    Substituting the value of $R$ in equation $(5)$

    $R'^{2}=4 A^{2} \frac{sin^{2}\alpha}{\alpha^{2}} cos^{2} \beta \qquad(7)$

    $R'=2 A \frac{sin\alpha}{\alpha} cos\beta \qquad(8)$

    The intensity of the resultant diffraction pattern at $P'$

    $I=4 A^{2} \frac{sin^{2}\alpha}{\alpha^{2}} cos^{2} \beta \qquad(9)$

    Where $\alpha=\frac{\pi}{\lambda}e\:sin\theta \qquad(10)$

    The resultant intensity at any point is the contribution of the following two factors →

  • The factor $\frac{A^{2}sin^{2}\alpha}{\alpha^{2}}$, represents the intensity distribution due to diffraction from any individual slits.

  • The factor $cos^{2}\beta$ represents the intensity distribution due to interference of waves from two parallel slits.

  • Condition for Maxima and Minima →
    1. Maxima and minima due to diffraction term
    2. Maxima and minima due to interference term

    1. Maxima and minima due to diffraction term →

    i.) Principal Maxima →

    The diffraction term $\frac{A^{2}sin^{2}\alpha}{\alpha^{2}}$ gives the central maxima, for $\alpha=0$ so

    $\frac{\pi}{\lambda}e\: sin\theta=0$

    $sin\theta =0 $

    $\theta=0$

    ii.) Minima →

    The diffraction term $\frac{A^{2}sin^{2}\alpha}{\alpha^{2}}$ gives the central minima, for $sin\alpha=0$ so

    $\alpha=\pm m\pi$

    $e\:sin\theta=\pm m\pi$

    iii.) Secondary Maxima →

    The secondary maxima are obtained in the direction given by →

    $\alpha= \pm\frac{3\pi}{2},\pm\frac{5\pi}{2},\pm\frac{7\pi}{2},..............$

    2. Maxima and minima due to interference term →

    i.) Maxima

    The interference term $cos^{2}\beta$ gives maxima in the direction →

    $cos^{2}=1$

    $\beta=\pm n \pi$

    $\frac{\pi}{\lambda}(e+d)sin\theta= \pm n \pi$

    $(e+d)sin\theta= \pm n \lambda$

    Where $n=0,1,2,3,.....$

    In the direction $\theta=0^{\circ}$, the principle maxima due to interference and diffraction coincide.

    ii.) Minima

    The interference term $cos^{2}\beta$ gives minima in the direction →

    $cos^{2}\beta=0$

    $\beta=\pm(2n+1)\frac{\pi}{2}$

    $(e+d)sin\theta=\pm(2n+1)\frac{\pi}{2}$

    The intensity distribution curve due to the diffraction term, interference term, and the combined effect is shown in the figure below →
    Intensity diagram of Fraunhofer double slit Experiment
    Intensity diagram of Fraunhofer double slit Experiment

    Comments

    Popular Posts

    Numerical Aperture and Acceptance Angle of the Optical Fibre

    Angle of Acceptance → If incident angle of light on the core for which the incident angle on the core-cladding interface equals the critical angle then incident angle of light on the core is called the "Angle of Acceptance. Transmission of light when the incident angle is equal to the acceptance angle If the incident angle is greater than the acceptance angle i.e. $\theta_{i}>\theta_{0}$ then the angle of incidence on the core-cladding interface will be less than the critical angle due to which part of the incident light is transmitted into cladding as shown in the figure below Transmission of light when the incident angle is greater than the acceptance angle If the incident angle is less than the acceptance angle i.e. $\theta_{i}<\theta_{0}$ then the angle of incidence on the core-cladding interface will be greater than the critical angle for which total internal reflection takes place inside the core. As shown in the figure below Transmission of lig

    Fraunhofer diffraction due to a single slit

    Let $S$ be a point monochromatic source of light of wavelength $\lambda$ placed at the focus of collimating lens $L_{1}$. The light beam is incident normally from $S$ on a narrow slit $AB$ of width $e$ and is diffracted from it. The diffracted beam is focused at the screen $XY$ by another converging lens $L_{2}$. The diffraction pattern having a central bright band followed by an alternative dark and bright band of decreasing intensity on both sides is obtained. Analytical Explanation: The light from the source $S$ is incident as a plane wavefront on the slit $AB$. According to Huygens's wave theory, every point in $AB$ sends out secondary waves in all directions. The undeviated ray from $AB$ is focused at $C$ on the screen by the lens $L_{2}$ while the rays diffracted through an angle $\theta$ are focussed at point $p$ on the screen. The rays from the ends $A$ and $B$ reach $C$ in the same phase and hence the intensity is maximum. Fraunhofer diffraction due to

    Particle in one dimensional box (Infinite Potential Well)

    Let us consider a particle of mass $m$ that is confined to one-dimensional region $0 \leq x \leq L$ or the particle is restricted to move along the $x$-axis between $x=0$ and $x=L$. Let the particle can move freely in either direction, between $x=0$ and $x=L$. The endpoints of the region behave as ideally reflecting barriers so that the particle can not leave the region. A potential energy function $V(x)$ for this situation is shown in the figure below. Particle in One-Dimensional Box(Infinite Potential Well) The potential energy inside the one -dimensional box can be represented as $\begin{Bmatrix} V(x)=0 &for \: 0\leq x \leq L \\ V(x)=\infty & for \: 0> x > L \\ \end{Bmatrix}$ $\frac{d^{2} \psi(x)}{d x^{2}}+\frac{2m}{\hbar^{2}}(E-V)\psi(x)=0 \qquad(1)$ If the particle is free in a one-dimensional box, Schrodinger's wave equation can be written as: $\frac{d^{2} \psi(x)}{d x^{2}}+\frac{2mE}{\hbar^{2}}\psi(x)=0$ $\frac{d^{2} \psi(x)}{d x