### Work done by a rotating electric dipole in uniform electric field

Derivation of Work done by a rotating electric dipole in uniform electric field :

Let us consider, An electric dipole AB, made up of two charges $+q$ and $-q$, is placed at a very small distance $2l$ in a uniform electric field $\overrightarrow{E}$. If dipole $AB$ rotates at angle $Î¸$ from its equilibrium position. If $A'$ and $B'$ are the new position of a dipole in the electric field. Then force on $+q$ charge particle due to electric field→

$\overrightarrow{F_{+q}}=q\overrightarrow{E}\qquad (1)$

Then force on $-q$ charge particle due to electric field→

$\overrightarrow{F_{-q}}=q\overrightarrow{E}\qquad(2)$
 Work done by rotating an electric dipole
So work done by a force on $+q$ charge particle to bring from position $A$ to position $A'$→

$\overrightarrow{W_{+q}}=\overrightarrow{F_{+q}}·\overrightarrow{AC}$

$\overrightarrow{W_{+q}}=q\overrightarrow{E}· \overrightarrow{AC}\qquad(3)$

Similarly, work done by the force on $-q$ charge particle to bring from position $B$ to position $B'$→

$\overrightarrow{W_{-q}}=\overrightarrow{F_{-q}}·\overrightarrow{BD}$

$\overrightarrow{W_{-q}}=q\overrightarrow{E}· \overrightarrow{BD}\qquad (4)$

So the total work is done by the force on the dipole→

$\overrightarrow{W}=\overrightarrow{W_{+q}}\:+\:\overrightarrow{W_{-q}}$

$\overrightarrow{W}=q\overrightarrow{E}·(\overrightarrow{AC}+\overrightarrow{BD})\qquad (5)$

From the figure, There is symmetry so

$\overrightarrow{AC}=\overrightarrow{BD}$

So from equation $(5)$

$\overrightarrow{W}=q\overrightarrow{E}·(2\overrightarrow{AC})$

$\overrightarrow{W}=2q\overrightarrow{E}(\overrightarrow{AO}-\overrightarrow{CO})\qquad (6)$

From figure→

$\left | \overrightarrow{AO} \right |=l$

$\left | \overrightarrow{CO} \right |=l\:cos \theta$

Now substitute the values in equation (6). So equation (6) can be written as in magnitude form →

$W=2qE(l-l\:cos\theta )$

$W=2qEl(1-cos\theta )$

$W=pE(1-cos\theta )$

The above expression shows that work is done on a rotating electric dipole in a uniform electric field.

Case (i):

If $\theta=0^{\circ}$, Then work done will be minimum

$W_{min}=0$

Case (ii):

If $\theta=90^{\circ}$, Then work done

$W=pE$

Case (iii):

If $\theta=180^{\circ}$, Then work done will be maximum

$W_{max}=2pE$

### Numerical Aperture and Acceptance Angle of the Optical Fibre

Angle of Acceptance → If incident angle of light on the core for which the incident angle on the core-cladding interface equals the critical angle then incident angle of light on the core is called the "Angle of Acceptance. Transmission of light when the incident angle is equal to the acceptance angle If the incident angle is greater then the acceptance angle i.e. $\theta_{i}>\theta_{0}$ then the angle of incidence on the core-cladding interface will be less than the critical angle due to which part of incident light is transmitted into cladding as shown in the figure below Transmission of light when the incident angle is greater than the acceptance angle If the incident angle is less then the acceptance angle i.e. $\theta_{i}<\theta_{0}$ then the angle of incidence on the core-cladding interface will be greater than the critical angle for which total internal reflection takes place inside the core. As shown in the figure below Transmission of light w

### Fraunhofer diffraction due to a single slit

Let $S$ be a point monochromatic source of light of wavelength $\lambda$ placed at the focus of collimating lens $L_{1}$. The light beam is incident normally from $S$ on a narrow slit $AB$ of width $e$ and is diffracted from it. The diffracted beam is focused at the screen $XY$ by another converging lens $L_{2}$. The diffraction pattern having a central bright band followed by an alternative dark and bright band of decreasing intensity on both sides is obtained. Analytical Explanation: The light from the source $S$ is incident as a plane wavefront on the slit $AB$. According to Huygens's wave theory, every point in $AB$ sends out secondary waves in all directions. The undeviated ray from $AB$ is focused at $C$ on the screen by the lens $L_{2}$ while the rays diffracted through an angle $\theta$ are focussed at point $p$ on the screen. The rays from the ends $A$ and $B$ reach $C$ in the same phase and hence the intensity is maximum. Fraunhofer diffraction due to

### Particle in one dimensional box (Infinite Potential Well)

Let us consider a particle of mass $m$ that is confined to one-dimensional region $0 \leq x \leq L$ or the particle is restricted to move along the $x$-axis between $x=0$ and $x=L$. Let the particle can move freely in either direction, between $x=0$ and $x=L$. The endpoints of the region behave as ideally reflecting barriers so that the particle can not leave the region. A potential energy function $V(x)$ for this situation is shown in the figure below. Particle in One-Dimensional Box(Infinite Potential Well) The potential energy inside the one -dimensional box can be represented as $\begin{Bmatrix} V(x)=0 &for \: 0\leq x \leq L \\ V(x)=\infty & for \: 0> x > L \\ \end{Bmatrix}$ $\frac{d^{2} \psi(x)}{d x^{2}}+\frac{2m}{\hbar^{2}}(E-V)\psi(x)=0 \qquad(1)$ If the particle is free in a one-dimensional box, Schrodinger's wave equation can be written as: $\frac{d^{2} \psi(x)}{d x^{2}}+\frac{2mE}{\hbar^{2}}\psi(x)=0$ \$\frac{d^{2} \psi(x)}{d x