Alternating Current Circuit containing Capacitance only (C-Circuit)

Alternating Current Circuit Containing Capacitance Only (C-Circuit): Let us consider, A circuit containing a capacitor of capacitance $C$ only which is connected with an alternating EMF i.e electromotive force source i.e.

Let us consider, A circuit containing a coil of inductance $L$ only which is connected with an alternating EMF i.e electromotive force source i.e.

$E=E_{\circ}sin\omega t\qquad(1)$

When alternating emf is applied across the capacitor plates then the charge on capacitor plates varies continuously and correspondingly current flows in the connecting leads. Let the charge on the capacitor plates is $q$ and the current in the circuit at any instant is $i$. Since there is no resistance in the circuit then the instantaneous potential difference is $\frac{q}{C}$ across the capacitor plates must be equal to the applied emf i.e.

$\frac{q}{C} = E_{\circ} sin \omega t$

$q = CE_{\circ} sin \omega t \qquad(2)$

The instantaneous current $i$ in the circuit is, therefore

$i=\frac{dq}{dt} \qquad(3)$

Now substitute the value of $q$ from equation $(2)$ to equation $(3)$

$i=\frac{d}{dt} CE_{\circ} sin \omega t $

$i=CE_{\circ} \omega cos\omega t$

$i=\omega CE_{\circ} cos\omega t$

$i=\frac{E_{\circ}}{\frac{1}{\omega C}} cos\omega t$

$i=\frac{E_{\circ}}{X_{C}} cos\omega t$

Where $X_{C}= \frac{1}{\omega C}$ is known as capacitive reactance.

$i=i_{\circ} cos\omega t \qquad(4)$

Where the $i_{\circ}=\frac{E_{\circ}}{X_{C}}$ is the maximum current in the circuit. Now apply Ohm's law in this equation and we find that the term $X_{C}=\frac{1}{\omega C}$ has the dimension of resistance. It represents the 'effective opposition' of the capacitor to the flow of alternating current. It is known as the 'reactance of the capacitor' or 'capacitive reactance' and is denoted by $X_{C}$. The capacitive reactance is infinite for DC for which $f=0$.

$i=i_{\circ} sin \left( \omega t + \frac{\pi}{2} \right) \qquad(4)$

Now compare equation $(1)$ and equation $(4)$ which shows that an alternating circuit containing a capacitor only, the current leads the emf by a phase angle of $\frac{\pi}{2}$ or $90^\circ$ (or the emf lags behind the current by a phase angle of $\frac{\pi}{2}$). The phase diagram between EMF and the current of a capacitor is shown below-

The phasor diagram between the EMF and current of a capacitor is also shown in the given figure below-

Read More

Alternating Current Circuit containing Inductance only (L-Circuit)

Alternating Current Circuit Containing Inductance only (L-Circuit): Let us consider, An alternating current circuit containing a coil of inductance $L$ only. This inductor is connected with an alternating EMF i.e electromotive force source i.e.

$E=E_{\circ}sin\omega t\qquad(1)$

The current $i$ in coil varies continuously then an opposite emf is induced in the coil whose magnitude is $L\frac{di}{dt}$ So the net instantaneous of the circuit:

$E_{\circ}sin\omega t -L\frac{di}{dt}=0$

$E_{\circ}sin\omega t =L\frac{di}{dt}$

$di=\frac{E_{\circ}}{L}sin\omega dt$

Now integrate the above equation then the above equation can be written as

$\int di=\int \frac{E_{\circ}}{L}sin\omega dt$

$\int di= \frac{E_{\circ}}{L} \int sin\omega dt$

$i= \frac{E_{\circ}}{L} \frac{-cos\omega t}{\omega}$

$i= -\frac{E_{\circ}}{\omega L} cos\omega t$

$i= -\frac{E_{\circ}}{X_{L}} cos\omega t$

Where $X_{L}= \omega L$ is known as inductive reactance.

$i= -i_{\circ} cos\omega t$

Where $i_{\circ}=\frac{E_{\circ}}{X_{L}}$ is known as the maximum value of current in the circuit. Now compare this equation to Ohm's law then we find that the term $X_{L}=\omega L$ has the dimensions of resistance. It defines the 'effective opposition' of the coil to the flow of alternating current. it is known as the 'reactance of the coil' or 'inductive reactance' and it is denoted by $X_{L}$. The inductive reactance $X_{L}$ is zero for DC at which frequency is zero.

$i= -i_{\circ} sin \left(\frac{\pi}{2}- \omega t \right)$

$i= i_{\circ} sin \left(\omega t - \frac{\pi}{2} \right) \qquad(2)$

Now compare equation $(1)$ and equation $(2)$ which shows that an alternating circuit containing an inductor only, the current lags behind the emf by a phase angle of $\frac{\pi}{2}$ or $90^\circ$ (or the emf leads the current by a phase angle of $\frac{\pi}{2}$). The phase diagram between EMF and the current of an inductor is shown below-

The phasor diagram between the EMF and current of an inductor is also shown in the given figure below-

Read More

Electric field Intensity (Definition) and Electric field Intensity due to point charge

Definition of Electric Field Intensity:

The force acting on the per unit test charge in electric field is called the Electric field intensity. It is represented by $'E'$.

Let us consider that a test-charged particle of $q_{0}$ Coulomb is placed at a point in the electric field and a force $F$ acting on them so the electric field intensity at that point

$ \overrightarrow{E}=\frac{\overrightarrow{F}}{q_{0}}$

SI Unit:$\quad Newton/Coulomb$ $ (N/C)$ $\quad Kg-m^{2}/sec^{3} A$

Dimension: $\left [ML^{2}T^{-3}A^{-1} \right ]$

Physical Significance of Electric Field:

The force experienced by a charge is different at different points in space. So electric field intensity also varies from point to point. In general, Electric field intensity is not a single vector quantity but it is a set of infinite vector and each point in space have a unique electric field intensity. So electric field is an example of the vector field.

Electric Field Intensity due to a Point Charge:

Let us consider that an isolated point charge of $+q$ Coulomb is placed at a point $O$ in a medium whose dielectric constant is $K$. If a test charge particle of $q_{0}$ Coulomb is placed at a point $P$ in the electric field at a distance $r$ from point $O$. So the electric field intensity (magnitude form) at point $P$

Electric field intensity due to a point charge

$E=\frac{F}{q_{0}}\qquad (1)$

According to Coulomb's Law:

$F=\frac{1}{4\pi \varepsilon _{0}K}\frac{qq_{0}}{r^{2}}\qquad (2)$

From equation $(1)$ and equation $(2)$, we can write

$E=\frac{1}{4\pi \varepsilon _{0}K}\frac{q}{r^{2}} \qquad (3)$

For air or vacuum $K=1$, Then from equation $(3)$

$E=\frac{1}{4\pi \varepsilon _{0}}\frac{q}{r^{2}} \qquad (4)$

Where

$\frac{1}{4\pi \varepsilon _{0}}=9\times10^{9} N-m^{2}/C^{2}$

From equation $(4)$

$E=9\times 10^{9} \frac{q}{r^{2}}\qquad (5)$

In Vector Notation:

$\overrightarrow{E}=\frac{1}{4\pi \varepsilon _{0}K}\frac{q}{r^{2}}r\hat{}$

If a system containing $'n'$ point charge $q_{1},q_{2},q_{3},..........q_{n}$ then electric field intensity due to the system of charge particle will be equal to the vector sum of the intensities i.e.

$\overrightarrow{E}=\overrightarrow{E_{1}}+\overrightarrow{E_{2}}+\overrightarrow{E_{3}}+....+\overrightarrow{E_{n}}$

$\overrightarrow{E}=\frac{1}{4\pi \varepsilon _{0}K}\sum_{i=0}^{n}\frac{q_{i}}{r_{i}^{2}}r_{i}\hat{}$

Where $r_{i}$ is the distance from point $'P'$ to charge $q_{i}$.

Read More

Refraction of light and its Properties

Definition of Refraction of light→ When a light goes from one medium to another medium then light bends from the path. This bending of the light phenomenon is knowns as the refraction of light.

When light goes from a rarer medium to a denser medium, light bends toward the normal as shown in the figure below:

Propagation of light from rarer medium to denser medium

When light goes from a denser medium to a rarer medium, the light goes away from normal as shown in the figure below.

Propagation of light from denser medium to rarer medium

Properties of refraction of light→

1. The incident ray, normal ray, and refracted ray lie on the same point.
2. According to Snell's law - The ratio of the sine of the incident angle to the sine of the refractive angle is always constant. This constant value is known as the refractive index of the medium.

$\frac{sin \: i}{sin \: r}=constant(_{1}n_{2}) $

$\frac{sin \: i}{sin \: r}= (_{1}n_{2})$

$\frac{sin \: i}{sin \:r}=\frac{n_{2}}{n_{1}}$

Where $_{1}n_{2}$ is the refractive index of medium $(2)$ with respect to medium $(1)$ .

Absolute refractive index→

The ratio of the speed of light in a vacuum to the speed of light in a medium is called the absolute refractive index of the medium.

$refractive\: index(n)=\frac{speed\: of\:light\: in\: vacuum(c)}{speed \:of \:light\: in\: medium(v)}$

$n=\frac{c}{v}$

Note

According to Snell's law -

$\frac{sin \: i}{sin \: r}=\frac{n_{2}}{n_{1}} \quad\quad (1)$

$\frac{sin \: i}{sin \: r}=\frac{\frac{c}{v_{1}}}{\frac{c}{v_{2}}} \quad\quad \left \{ \because n=\frac{c}{v} \right \}$

$\frac{sin i}{sin r}=\frac{v_{1}}{v_{2}} \qquad (2)$

When the light goes from one medium to another medium frequency of the light does not change but the wavelength of the light changes. So above given equation can be written as

$\frac{sin \: i}{sin \: r}=\frac{\nu \lambda_{1}}{\nu \lambda_{2}} \quad\quad \left \{ \because v=\nu \lambda \right \} $

$\displaystyle \frac{sin \: i}{sin \: r}=\frac{\lambda_{1}}{ \lambda_{2}} \qquad (3)$

From equation $(1)$ ,equation $(2)$, and equation $(3)$ we can write the equation

$\frac{sin \: i}{sin \: r}=\frac{n_{2}}{n_{1}} =\frac{v_{1}}{v_{2}}= \frac{\lambda_{1}}{ \lambda_{2}}$

Conditions for a light ray to pass undeviated on refraction of light→

A ray of light passes undeviated from medium $1$ to medium $2$ in either of the following two conditions:

1. When the angle of incidence at the boundary of two media is zero $\angle i =0^{\circ} so \ \angle r= 0^{\circ}$.
2. When the refractive index of the medium (2) and medium (1) is the same i.e. $i=r$.

Factors affecting the refractive index of the medium→

The refractive index of a medium depends on basically following three factors:

1. Nature of the medium (on the basis of speed of light)→ Less the speed of light in the medium as compared to that in the air more is the refractive index of the medium. $\left ( n=\frac{c}{v}\right)$

Speed of light in glass- $v_{glass} = 2\times 10^{6} ms^{-1}$

$\mu_{glass} = 1\cdot 5$

Speed of light in water- $v_{water} = 2\cdot25\times10^8ms^{-1}$

$\mu_{water} = 1\cdot33$

2. Physical conditions such as temperature→ With the increase in temperature, the speed of light in the medium, so the refractive index of the medium decreases.

3. The colour or wavelength of light→ The speed of light of all colours is the same in the air ( or vacuum), but in any other transparent medium, the speed of light is different for different colours. In a given medium the speed of red light is maximum and that of the violet light is least, therefore the refractive index of that medium is maximum for violet is and least for red light i.e. $\left ( \ n_{violet}> n_{red}\right )$. The wavelength of visible light increase from violet to red end, so the refractive index of a medium decreases with the increases in wavelength.

Read More

Alternating Current Circuit containing Resistance only (R-Circuit)

Alternating Current Circuit containing Resistance (R-Circuit): Let us consider, An alternating current circuit containing resistance $R$ only. This resistance $R$ is connected with an alternating EMF i.e electromotive force source i.e.

$E=E_{\circ}sin\omega t\qquad(1)$

The potential difference across the circuit

$E=iR$

Then from equation $(1)$

$iR=E_{\circ}sin\omega t $

$i=\frac{E_{\circ}}{R}sin\omega t $

$i=i_{\circ}sin\omega t \qquad(2) $

Where $i_{\circ}$ is the peak value or amplitude of the current in the circuit which has value $i_{\circ}=\frac{E_{\circ}}{R}$.

Now compare the equation $(1)$ and equation $(2)$ which shows that if a circuit is containing a resistor only then the current is always in phase with the applied EMF i.e electromotive force. The phase diagram between EMF and the current of resistance is shown below-

The phasor diagram between the EMF and current of resistance is also shown in the given figure below-

Read More

Derivation of Addition of Velocity in Special Relativity

Addition of Velocities:

Let us consider two frames $S$ and $S'$, frame $S'$ is moving with constant velocity $v$ relative to frame $S$ along the positive direction of the X-axis.

Let us express the velocity of the body in these frames. Suppose that body moves a distance $dx$ in time $dt$ in frame $S$ and through a distance $dx'$ in the time $dt'$ in the system $S'$ from point $P$ to $Q$. Then

Addition of velocity

$\frac{dx}{dt} = u\qquad \frac{dx'}{dt'}= u'\qquad (1)$

From Lorentz's inverse transformation

$x=\alpha\left ( x'+vt' \right )\qquad(2)$

$t=\alpha '\left ( t'+\frac{v\cdot x'}{c^{2}} \right )\qquad(3)$

Differentiate the equation $(2)$ and equation $(3)$ with respect to $t'$

$\frac{dx}{dt'}= \alpha \left ( \frac{dx'}{dt'}+v \right )\qquad(4)$

$\frac{dt}{dt'}= \alpha ' \left ({1}+\frac{v}{c^{2}} \cdot \frac{dx'}{dt'} \right )\quad (5)$

Now divide the equation $(4)$ by equation $(4)$. So

$\frac{\frac{dx}{dt'}}{\frac{dt}{dt'}} = \left ( \frac{\frac{dx'}{dt}+v}{1+\frac{v}{c^{2}}\cdot \frac{dx'}{dt'} } \right ) \qquad $

From Lorentz Transformation $\alpha =\alpha '$. So above equation can be written as:

$\frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{u' +v}{1+ \frac{u'v}{c^{2}}}$

From equation $(1)$. The above equation can be written as:

$u = \frac{u' +v}{1+ \frac{u'v}{c^{2}}} $

This equation represents the relativistic law of addition of velocities with respect to an observer at frame-$S$ whereas in classical mechanics it is simply $u = u'+v$. There is the following point observed from the addition of the velocities equation.

1. When $u'$ and $v$ are the smaller as compare to $c$, then $\frac{v\cdot u'}{c^{2}}$ can be negligible so
   
   
   $u = u'+v$
   
   
   which is classical formula.


2. When $u' = c$Then $u =\frac{c+v}{1+\frac{v}{c}}$ So,
   
   
   $u=c$
   
   
   Therefore a object moves with velocity of light $c$ with respect to other, then their relative velocity is always $c$.


3. When $v=u'=c$Then $u =\frac{c+c}{1+\frac{c^{2}}{c^{2}}}=c$ So,
   
   
   $u=v$
   
   
   This shows that the addition of the velocity of light simply reproduces the velocity of light. It means that the velocity of light in a vacuum is the maximum achievable velocity in nature and no signal and any object can travel faster than the velocity of light in a vacuum.

Read More

Work done by a rotating electric dipole in uniform electric field

Derivation of Work done by a rotating electric dipole in uniform electric field :

Let us consider, An electric dipole AB, made up of two charges $+q$ and $-q$, is placed at a very small distance $2l$ in a uniform electric field $\overrightarrow{E}$. If dipole $AB$ rotates at angle $θ$ from its equilibrium position. If $A'$ and $B'$ are the new position of a dipole in the electric field. Then force on $+q$ charge particle due to electric field→

$ \overrightarrow{F_{+q}}=q\overrightarrow{E}\qquad (1)$

Then force on $-q$ charge particle due to electric field→

$ \overrightarrow{F_{-q}}=q\overrightarrow{E}\qquad(2)$

Work done by rotating an electric dipole 

So work done by a force on $+q$ charge particle to bring from position $A$ to position $A'$→

$ \overrightarrow{W_{+q}}=\overrightarrow{F_{+q}}·\overrightarrow{AC}$

$ \overrightarrow{W_{+q}}=q\overrightarrow{E}· \overrightarrow{AC}\qquad(3)$

Similarly, work done by the force on $-q$ charge particle to bring from position $B$ to position $B'$→

$ \overrightarrow{W_{-q}}=\overrightarrow{F_{-q}}·\overrightarrow{BD}$

$ \overrightarrow{W_{-q}}=q\overrightarrow{E}· \overrightarrow{BD}\qquad (4)$

So the total work is done by the force on the dipole→

$ \overrightarrow{W}=\overrightarrow{W_{+q}}\:+\:\overrightarrow{W_{-q}}$

$\overrightarrow{W}=q\overrightarrow{E}·(\overrightarrow{AC}+\overrightarrow{BD})\qquad (5)$

From the figure, There is symmetry so

$ \overrightarrow{AC}=\overrightarrow{BD}$

So from equation $(5)$

$ \overrightarrow{W}=q\overrightarrow{E}·(2\overrightarrow{AC})$

$ \overrightarrow{W}=2q\overrightarrow{E}(\overrightarrow{AO}-\overrightarrow{CO})\qquad (6)$

From figure→

$ \left | \overrightarrow{AO} \right |=l$

$ \left | \overrightarrow{CO} \right |=l\:cos \theta$

Now substitute the values in equation (6). So equation (6) can be written as in magnitude form →

$ W=2qE(l-l\:cos\theta )$

$ W=2qEl(1-cos\theta )$

$ W=pE(1-cos\theta )$

The above expression shows that work is done on a rotating electric dipole in a uniform electric field.

Case (i):

If $\theta=0^{\circ}$, Then work done will be minimum

$W_{min}=0$

Case (ii):

If $\theta=90^{\circ}$, Then work done

$W=pE$

Case (iii):

If $\theta=180^{\circ}$, Then work done will be maximum

$W_{max}=2pE$

Read More

Electric field Intensity due a uniformly charged Spherical Shell

Electric field intensity at a different point in the field due to the uniformly charged spherical shell:

Let us consider, a spherical shell of radius $R$ in which $+q$ charge is distributed uniformly on the surface of the sphere. Now find the electric field intensity at different points due to the spherical shell. These different points are:

1.) Electric field intensity at an external point of the spherical shell
2.) Electric field intensity on the surface of the spherical shell
3.) Electric field intensity at an internal point of the spherical shell

1. Electric field intensity at an external point of the spherical shell:

If point $O$ is the center of the spherical shell, The electric field at the outside of the spherical shell can be determined by the following steps →

1.) First, take the point $P$ outside the sphere
2.) Draw a spherical surface of radius r which passes through point $P$.This hypothetical surface is known as the Gaussian surface.
3) Now take a small area $\overrightarrow {dA} $ around point $P$ on the Gaussian surface to find the electric flux passing through it.
4.) Now find the direction between the electric field vector and small area vector.

Due to uniform charge distribution, the electric field intensity will be the same at every point on the Gaussian surface. So from the figure,

Electric field intensity due to the uniformly charged

The direction of electric field intensity on the Gaussian surface is radially outward which is in the direction of the area vector of the Gaussian surface. i.e. ($\theta=0^{\circ}$).Here $\overrightarrow {dA}$ is small area around point $P$ so the small electric flux $d\phi_{E}$ will pass through this small area $\overrightarrow {dA}$. so this flux can be found by applying the Gauss's law in question given below:

$ d\phi_{E}= \overrightarrow {E}\cdot \overrightarrow{dA}$

$ d\phi_{E}= E\:dA\: cos 0^{\circ} \qquad \left \{\because \theta=0^{\circ} \right \}$

$ d\phi_{E}= E\:dA \qquad (1) \quad \left\{\because cos0=1 \right \}$

The electric flux passing through the entire Gaussian surface, So integrate the equation $(1)$ →

$ \phi_{E}=\oint E\:dA\qquad(2)$

According to Gauss's law:

$ \phi_{E}=\frac{q}{\epsilon_{0}}\qquad (3)$

From equation (1) and equation (2), we can write as

$ \frac{q}{\epsilon_{0}}=\oint E\:dA$

$ \frac{q}{\epsilon_{0}}= E\oint dA$

The area of entire Gaussian spherical is $\oint {dA}=4\pi r^{2}$. Now substitute this value in above equation. So above equation can be written as:

$ \frac{q}{\epsilon_{0}}= E(4\pi r^{2})$

$ E=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}}\frac{q}{r^{2}}$

From the above equation, we can conclude that the behavior of the electric field at the external point due to the uniformly charged spherical shell is the same as, like the entire charge is placed at the center, point charge

If the surface charge density is $\sigma$, Then total charge $q$ on the surface of a spherical shell is →

$ q=4\pi R^{2}\: \sigma$

Substitute this value of charge $q$ in above equation, so we can write the equation as:

$ E=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}}\frac{4\pi R^{2}\: \sigma}{r^{2}}$

$ E=\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_{0}}\frac{R^{2}}{r^{2}}$

This equation describes the electric field intensity at the external point of the spherical shell.

2. Electric field intensity on the surface of the spherical shell:

If point $P$ is placed on the surface of the spherical shell i.e ($r=R$). so electric field intensity on the surface of the spherical shell can be found by putting $r=R$ in the formula of the electric field intensity at the external point of the spherical shell:

$ E=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}}\frac{q}{R^{2}}$

$ E=\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_{0}}$

3. Electric field intensity at an internal point of the spherical shell:

If point $P$ is placed inside the spherical shell then the electric field intensity will be zero at that point because the charge is distributed uniformly on the surface of the solid sphere so there will not be any charge on the Gaussian surface and electric flux will be zero inside the solid sphere. i.e.

$ \phi_{E}=\oint E\:dA$

$ 0=E\oint dA \qquad \left \{ \because \phi_{E}=0 \right \}$

$ E=0$

Electric field intensity distribution with distance for Spherical Shell:

Electric field intensity distribution with distance shows that the electric field is maximum on the surface of the sphere and zero inside the sphere. Electric field intensity distribution outside the sphere reduces with the distance according to $E=\frac{1}{r^{2}}$.

Electric field intensity distribution with distance

Read More

Energy distribution laws of black body radiation

1.) Wein’s laws of Energy distributions→

A.) Wein's Fifth Power law→ The total amount of the energy emitted by a black body per unit volume at an absolute temperature in the wavelength range $\lambda$ and $\lambda + d\lambda$ is given as

$E\lambda \cdot d\lambda= \frac{A}{\lambda^{5}}f\left ( \lambda T \right ) \cdot d\lambda \qquad (1)$

Where $A$ is a constant and $f(\lambda T)$ is a function of the product $\lambda T$ and is given as

$ f\left ( \lambda T\right )=e^-\frac{hc}{\lambda kT}\qquad (2)$

From equation $(1)$ and $(2)$

$E_\lambda \cdot d\lambda = \frac{A}{\lambda ^{5}}e^\frac{-hc}{\lambda kT} \cdot d\lambda$

$E_\lambda \cdot d \lambda = A \lambda ^{-5} e^\frac{-hc}{\lambda kT} \cdot d \lambda$

Wien’s law energy distribution explains the energy distribution at the short wavelength at higher temperatures and fails for long wavelengths.

B.) Wein's Displacement law→ As the temperature of the body is raised the maximum energy shift toward the shorter wavelength i.e.

$\lambda_{m} \times T = Constant $

Where
$\lambda_m$- Wavelength at which the energy is maximum
$T$-Absolute temperature

Thus, if radiation of a particular wavelength at a certain temperature is adiabatically altered to another wavelength then temperature changes in the inverse ratio.

2.) Rayleigh-Jean’s law→ The total amount of energy emitted by a black body per unit volume at an absolute temperature T in the wavelength range $\lambda $ and $\lambda +d\lambda $ is given as

$E_{\lambda}.d\lambda = \frac{8\pi kt}{\lambda ^{4}}.d\lambda$

Where K– Boltzmann’s Constant which has valve $ 1.381\times 10^{23}\frac{J}{K}$

This law, explains the energy distribution at the longer wavelength at all temperatures and fails totally for the shorter wavelength.

Note→ The energy distribution curves of the black body show a peak while going towards the ultraviolet wavelength (shorter $ \lambda $) and then fall while Rayleigh-Jeans law indicates continuous rise only. This is the failure of classical physics.

3.) Stefan-Boltzmann Law→ The total amount of heat radiated by a perfectly black body per unit area per second is directly proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature $(T)$. i.e.

$E \propto T^{4}$

$E = \sigma T^{4}$

Where $\sigma$= Stefan’s Constant which has value $5.67\times 10^{-8} W-\frac{K^{4}}{m^{2}}$

It is a black body at absolute temperature $T$ is surrounded by another black body at absolute temperature $T_{0}$, The net amount of heat $E$ lost by the former per second per $cm^{2}$ is→

$E=\sigma (T^{4}-T_{0}^{^{4}})$

Read More

Relation between group velocity and phase velocity

We know that phase velocity

$V_{p}=\frac{\omega }{k}$

$\omega =V_{p}.k \qquad(1)$

And group velocity

$V_{g}=\frac{d\omega}{dk} \qquad(2)$

Substitute the value of $\omega$ from equation$(1)$ in equation $(2)$

$V_{g}=\frac{d}{dk}(V_{p}.k)$

$V_{g}=V_{p}+k.\frac{dV_{p}}{dk}$

$V_{p}=V_{p}+k.\frac{dV_{p}}{d\lambda}.\frac{d\lambda }{dk} \qquad (3)$

But

$\lambda=\frac{2\pi }{k}$

The above equation can be obtain from following formula i.e. $k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda }$

Now put the value of $\lambda$ in equation $(3)$

$V_{g}=V_{p}+k\frac{dV_{p}}{d\lambda}\frac{d}{dk}(\frac{2\pi }{k}$

$V_{g}=V_{p}+k\frac{dV_{p}}{d\lambda}(\frac{-2\pi }{k^{2}}$

$V_{g}=V_{p}-\frac{2\pi}{k}\frac{dV_{p}}{d\lambda }$

$V_{g}=V_{p}-\lambda\frac{dV_{p}}{d\lambda }$

Thus, the above equation represents the relation between group velocity and phase velocity.

Read More